added instruction part

This commit is contained in:
hannes.kuchelmeister
2019-12-09 17:08:38 +01:00
parent e3f51ea48b
commit 0e981d6697

View File

@@ -1,60 +1,20 @@
\chapter{Introduction} \chapter{Introduction}
\label{ch:Introduction} \label{ch:Introduction}
%% ------------------- \section{Motivation}
%% | Example content | \label{sec:Introduction:Motivation}
%% -------------------
This is the SDQ thesis template. Product configuration supports companies in their sales process, it reduces costs and decreases time needed to produce an offer for a product \cite{shafieeCostBenefitAnalysis2018}. Usually configuration is done by one user but for complex decisions the risk that a single user will make mistakes increases therefore making the decision in a group can yield better results \cite{felferningGroupBasedConfiguration2016, felfernigGroupDecisionSupport2011}. Unfortunately groups are not immune to group biases and group dynamics that can reduce the benefits of group decisions \cite{kerrBiasJudgmentComparing1996}.
For more information on the formatting of theses at SDQ, please refer to There exists work on recommender systems for configuration and there are recommender systems for groups but there has not been any work on how to combine these. A recommender system, can help reduce influence of group behaviour and thereby increases the benefit of groups making more rational decisions than individuals \cite{charnessGroupsMakeBetter2012}.
\url{https://sdqweb.ipd.kit.edu/wiki/Ausarbeitungshinweise} or to your advisor.
\section{Example: Citation} \section{Research Question}
\label{sec:Introduction:Citation} \label{sec:Introduction:ResearchQuestion}
A citation: \cite{becker2008a} For referencing, see \autoref{sec:Introduction:Figures} \begin{enumerate}
\item How can decision-making in group configuration processes be supported (through recommender systems)? (central question)
\item Which requirements do configuration systems for collaborative decision-making have?
\item How does group hierarchy and structure influence the decision-making process in group based configuration scenarios?
\end{enumerate}
\section{Example: Figures} \section{Structure}
\label{sec:Introduction:Figures} \label{sec:Introduction:Structure}
\begin{figure}[h] \todo[inline]{describe structure of the proposal}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=4cm]{logos/sdqlogo}
\caption{SDQ logo}
\label{fig:sdqlogo}
\end{figure}
A reference: The SDQ logo is displayed in \autoref{fig:sdqlogo}.
(Use \code{\textbackslash autoref\{\}} for easy referencing.)
A citation: Cite this \cite{mendoncaCollaborativeProductConfiguration2008}.
\section{Example: Tables}
\label{sec:Introduction:Tables}
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{r l}
\toprule
abc & def\\
ghi & jkl\\
\midrule
123 & 456\\
789 & 0AB\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\caption{A table}
\label{tab:atable}
\end{table}
\section{Example: Todo-Note}
Meaningless text.
\section{Example: Formula}
One of the nice things about the Linux Libertine font is that it comes with
a math mode package.
\begin{displaymath}
f(x)=\Omega(g(x))\ (x\rightarrow\infty)\;\Leftrightarrow\;
\limsup_{x \to \infty} \left|\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}\right|> 0
\end{displaymath}
%% --------------------
%% | /Example content |
%% --------------------