mirror of
https://github.com/13hannes11/bachelor_thesis.git
synced 2024-09-04 01:11:00 +02:00
added instruction part
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,60 +1,20 @@
|
||||
\chapter{Introduction}
|
||||
\label{ch:Introduction}
|
||||
|
||||
%% -------------------
|
||||
%% | Example content |
|
||||
%% -------------------
|
||||
\section{Motivation}
|
||||
\label{sec:Introduction:Motivation}
|
||||
|
||||
This is the SDQ thesis template.
|
||||
For more information on the formatting of theses at SDQ, please refer to
|
||||
\url{https://sdqweb.ipd.kit.edu/wiki/Ausarbeitungshinweise} or to your advisor.
|
||||
Product configuration supports companies in their sales process, it reduces costs and decreases time needed to produce an offer for a product \cite{shafieeCostBenefitAnalysis2018}. Usually configuration is done by one user but for complex decisions the risk that a single user will make mistakes increases therefore making the decision in a group can yield better results \cite{felferningGroupBasedConfiguration2016, felfernigGroupDecisionSupport2011}. Unfortunately groups are not immune to group biases and group dynamics that can reduce the benefits of group decisions \cite{kerrBiasJudgmentComparing1996}.
|
||||
There exists work on recommender systems for configuration and there are recommender systems for groups but there has not been any work on how to combine these. A recommender system, can help reduce influence of group behaviour and thereby increases the benefit of groups making more rational decisions than individuals \cite{charnessGroupsMakeBetter2012}.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Example: Citation}
|
||||
\label{sec:Introduction:Citation}
|
||||
A citation: \cite{becker2008a} For referencing, see \autoref{sec:Introduction:Figures}
|
||||
\section{Research Question}
|
||||
\label{sec:Introduction:ResearchQuestion}
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item How can decision-making in group configuration processes be supported (through recommender systems)? (central question)
|
||||
\item Which requirements do configuration systems for collaborative decision-making have?
|
||||
\item How does group hierarchy and structure influence the decision-making process in group based configuration scenarios?
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Example: Figures}
|
||||
\label{sec:Introduction:Figures}
|
||||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=4cm]{logos/sdqlogo}
|
||||
\caption{SDQ logo}
|
||||
\label{fig:sdqlogo}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
A reference: The SDQ logo is displayed in \autoref{fig:sdqlogo}.
|
||||
(Use \code{\textbackslash autoref\{\}} for easy referencing.)
|
||||
|
||||
A citation: Cite this \cite{mendoncaCollaborativeProductConfiguration2008}.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Example: Tables}
|
||||
\label{sec:Introduction:Tables}
|
||||
\begin{table}[h]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{r l}
|
||||
\toprule
|
||||
abc & def\\
|
||||
ghi & jkl\\
|
||||
\midrule
|
||||
123 & 456\\
|
||||
789 & 0AB\\
|
||||
\bottomrule
|
||||
\end{tabular}
|
||||
\caption{A table}
|
||||
\label{tab:atable}
|
||||
\end{table}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Example: Todo-Note}
|
||||
Meaningless text.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Example: Formula}
|
||||
One of the nice things about the Linux Libertine font is that it comes with
|
||||
a math mode package.
|
||||
\begin{displaymath}
|
||||
f(x)=\Omega(g(x))\ (x\rightarrow\infty)\;\Leftrightarrow\;
|
||||
\limsup_{x \to \infty} \left|\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}\right|> 0
|
||||
\end{displaymath}
|
||||
|
||||
%% --------------------
|
||||
%% | /Example content |
|
||||
%% --------------------
|
||||
\section{Structure}
|
||||
\label{sec:Introduction:Structure}
|
||||
\todo[inline]{describe structure of the proposal}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user