mirror of
https://github.com/13hannes11/bachelor_thesis.git
synced 2024-09-04 01:11:00 +02:00
change wording of question for evaluation section
This commit is contained in:
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ Now the recommendation procedure looks as follows:
|
|||||||
\end{itemize}
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Evaluation}
|
\section{Evaluation of Case Study}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For one example e.g. forest example generate all possible valid configurations.
|
For one example e.g. forest example generate all possible valid configurations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ Generate groups with preferences (explicit preferences) and configuration state
|
|||||||
\subsection{Questions to Answer During the Evaluation}
|
\subsection{Questions to Answer During the Evaluation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{itemize}
|
\begin{itemize}
|
||||||
\item How close are recommendations to the ideal recommendations depending on the number of stored finished configurations?
|
\item How close are recommendations of the recommender system to the ideal recommendation depending on the number of stored recommendations? The ideal configuration is the configuration that has the highest score with the given group scoring function $score_{group}$.
|
||||||
\item Is this approach practical?
|
\item Is this approach practical?
|
||||||
\end{itemize}
|
\end{itemize}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user