From 8584427d630fc058479aac44908236769f436f09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "hannes.kuchelmeister" Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:42:19 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] change wording of question for evaluation section --- 25_Outline/outline.tex | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/25_Outline/outline.tex b/25_Outline/outline.tex index 515c489..6b39b04 100644 --- a/25_Outline/outline.tex +++ b/25_Outline/outline.tex @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ Now the recommendation procedure looks as follows: \end{itemize} -\section{Evaluation} +\section{Evaluation of Case Study} For one example e.g. forest example generate all possible valid configurations. @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ Generate groups with preferences (explicit preferences) and configuration state \subsection{Questions to Answer During the Evaluation} \begin{itemize} - \item How close are recommendations to the ideal recommendations depending on the number of stored finished configurations? + \item How close are recommendations of the recommender system to the ideal recommendation depending on the number of stored recommendations? The ideal configuration is the configuration that has the highest score with the given group scoring function $score_{group}$. \item Is this approach practical? \end{itemize}