13hannes11/bachelor_thesis
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/13hannes11/bachelor_thesis.git synced 2024-09-04 01:11:00 +02:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

change caption and reorde graphic in threshold center subsection

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
hannes.kuchelmeister
2020-03-30 16:36:26 +02:00
parent fce5c6264f
commit 68dedeb625
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
30_Thesis/sections/60_evaluation.tex
View File

@@ -207,10 +207,12 @@ To get an understanding of the data all parameters except the $tc$ will be fixed
\label{fig:Evaluation:tcChange}
\end{figure}
\hyporef{hyp:Evaluation:MaximumMinimum} states that the highest satisfaction change is expected at places where the overall satisfaction with the dictator's decision is one. However the data shows a slightly different result. This hypothesis does not hold true. When looking at the data we see peeks in satisfaction change when $2.81, 2.51, 3$ (heterogeneous, random, homogenous). Therefore the expectation does not hold up. Moreover, valleys for dissatisfaction change are also not at the expected value of \textit{two}. They are instead at $1.19, 1.49, 0.04$ (heterogeneous, random, homogenous). Here the valleys are lower than expected. However data from homogenous groups seems cut of therefore it is not possible to say if there could be a potentially bigger decrease if the solution space is bigger.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{./figures/60_evaluation/tc_dictator__multi__db-size-148.pdf}
\caption{The average satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the dictator's decision based on $tc$ with a database size of 148 and multiplication as aggregation strategy.}
\caption{The average satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the dictator's decision based on $tc$.}
\label{fig:Evaluation:tcCount}
\end{figure}