From 68dedeb62583e039edebd1cf21be3f2df7f4e752 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "hannes.kuchelmeister" <hannes.kuchelmeister@cas.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:36:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] change caption and reorde graphic in threshold center
 subsection

---
 30_Thesis/sections/60_evaluation.tex | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/30_Thesis/sections/60_evaluation.tex b/30_Thesis/sections/60_evaluation.tex
index 78a6788..c474ead 100644
--- a/30_Thesis/sections/60_evaluation.tex
+++ b/30_Thesis/sections/60_evaluation.tex
@@ -207,10 +207,12 @@ To get an understanding of the data all parameters except the $tc$ will be fixed
     \label{fig:Evaluation:tcChange}
 \end{figure}
 
+\hyporef{hyp:Evaluation:MaximumMinimum} states that the highest satisfaction change is expected at places where the overall satisfaction with the dictator's decision is one. However the data shows a slightly different result. This hypothesis does not hold true. When looking at the data we see peeks in satisfaction change when $2.81, 2.51, 3$ (heterogeneous, random, homogenous). Therefore the expectation does not hold up. Moreover, valleys for dissatisfaction change are also not at the expected value of \textit{two}. They are instead at $1.19, 1.49, 0.04$ (heterogeneous, random, homogenous). Here the valleys are lower than expected. However data from homogenous groups seems cut of therefore it is not possible to say if there could be a potentially bigger decrease if the solution space is bigger.
+
 \begin{figure}
     \centering
     \includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{./figures/60_evaluation/tc_dictator__multi__db-size-148.pdf}
-    \caption{The average satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the dictator's decision based on $tc$ with a database size of 148 and multiplication as aggregation strategy.}
+    \caption{The average satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the dictator's decision based on $tc$.}
     \label{fig:Evaluation:tcCount}
 \end{figure}