13hannes11/bachelor_thesis
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/13hannes11/bachelor_thesis.git synced 2024-09-04 01:11:00 +02:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

replaced forest use case by forestry

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
hannes.kuchelmeister
2020-05-06 17:02:50 +02:00
parent c791ee0921
commit 54817ef2b3
2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
30_Thesis/sections/40_concept.tex
View File

@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ The case study used in this thesis is a simplified version from forestry \todo[]
The used characteristics and attributes are shown in \autoref{fig:Concept:ForestExample}. Additionally, as examples preferences, a configuration state and a finished configuration are given.
\begin{figure}
\begin{mdframed}[frametitle={Example for Forest Use Case}, linecolor=black, frametitlerulecolor=black, frametitlebackgroundcolor=gray!5]
\begin{mdframed}[frametitle={Example for Forestry Use Case}, linecolor=black, frametitlerulecolor=black, frametitlebackgroundcolor=gray!5]
In this example there is a small group of users. The use case is a piece of forest and variables are for example harvesting activity, which trees to grow and accessibility for people.
\begin{align}
\begin{split}
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ The used characteristics and attributes are shown in \autoref{fig:Concept:Forest
\end{split} \notag
\end{align}
\end{mdframed}
\caption{An example of a forest use case that includes two people.}
\caption{An example of use case in forestry that includes two people.}
\label{fig:Concept:ForestExample}
\end{figure}

6
30_Thesis/sections/60_evaluation.tex
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
\chapter{Evaluation}
\label{ch:Evaluation}
In this chapter the prototype is evaluated in terms of its functionality and its properties. The evaluation is an offline evaluation with synthetic data. All possible valid configurations are generated for one use case, i.e. all possible valid configurations for the forest use case. Moreover, groups with explicit preferences and a configuration state (which, e.g. would be the currently existing forest) are generated, too.
In this chapter the prototype is evaluated in terms of its functionality and its properties. The evaluation is an offline evaluation with synthetic data. All possible valid configurations are generated for one use case, i.e. all possible valid configurations for the forestry use case. Moreover, groups with explicit preferences and a configuration state (which, e.g. would be the currently existing forest) are generated, too.
\section{Metric}
\label{sec:Evaluation:Metrics}
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ To evaluate the recommender, a use case is needed. In this thesis, a forestry us
& high & & & & & & & & & n & & n & n & & & n & & & & - & - & - \\ \hline
\end{tabularx}
\caption{Constrains in \emph{not with} form for the forest use case.}
\caption{Constrains in \emph{not with} form for the foreststry use case.}
\label{tab:Evaluation:UseCase}
\end{center}
\end{table}
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ Unfinished configurations are generated using all finished configurations and ta
\subsection{Preference Generation}
For the forest use case, the idea is that there are multiple types of user profiles. Each group profile is represented by a neutral, negative or positive attitude towards a characteristic. During data generation the attitude is converted to a preference using a normal distribution. Each preference lies in the interval $[0,1]$. Zero can be seen as worst possible option and one as best possible option. \autoref{fig:Evaluation:PreferenceDistribution} shows how the user profile can be converted to preferences. The actual group member profiles are shown in \autoref{tab:Evaluation:GroupMemberMappings}.
For the forestry use case, the idea is that there are multiple types of user profiles. Each group profile is represented by a neutral, negative or positive attitude towards a characteristic. During data generation the attitude is converted to a preference using a normal distribution. Each preference lies in the interval $[0,1]$. Zero can be seen as worst possible option and one as best possible option. \autoref{fig:Evaluation:PreferenceDistribution} shows how the user profile can be converted to preferences. The actual group member profiles are shown in \autoref{tab:Evaluation:GroupMemberMappings}.
\pgfplotsset{height=5cm,width=\textwidth,compat=1.8}
\pgfmathdeclarefunction{gauss}{2}{%