removed mentions of use cases

This commit is contained in:
hannes.kuchelmeister
2020-01-29 15:38:59 +01:00
parent 11b424a4ff
commit 44e7e14bce

View File

@@ -39,13 +39,13 @@ Examples of that are:
\item Recommendations should always be valid options (i.e. configurations)
\end{itemize}
\section{Use Cases}
The system has one main use case as defined here. See Table \ref{table:simulation_parameters}.
\section{User Interaction with the System}
The system has one main way to be used as defined in \autoref{table:simulation_parameters}.
\begin{table}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabularx}{\columnwidth}{l|X}
\multicolumn{2}{c}{Main Use Case} \\
\multicolumn{2}{c}{Main System Usage} \\
\hline
Preconditions & \tabitem The configurator is opened with the same session on each of the group member's machines \\
& \tabitem The configuration is in an unfinished state (this state is a consensus state)\\
@@ -58,13 +58,15 @@ The system has one main use case as defined here. See Table \ref{table:simulatio
& \tabitem[3.] If not all users have given their preferences go to step 1. \\
\hline
\end{tabularx}
\caption{Main Use Case}
\caption{A description of the main way users will interact with the system}
\label{table:simulation_parameters}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\FloatBarrier
\FloatBarrier
\section{Technical Focus}
Given an unfinished configuration and preferences of all group members rate a finished configuration on how well "similar" it reflects the configuration + preferences.