From 44e7e14bce6ec1b4a9822984bc56fbaf565e1c80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "hannes.kuchelmeister" <hannes.kuchelmeister@cas.de>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:38:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] removed mentions of use cases

---
 25_Outline/outline.tex | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/25_Outline/outline.tex b/25_Outline/outline.tex
index 8efb132..e5ae281 100644
--- a/25_Outline/outline.tex
+++ b/25_Outline/outline.tex
@@ -39,13 +39,13 @@ Examples of that are:
     \item Recommendations should always be valid options (i.e. configurations)
 \end{itemize}
 
-\section{Use Cases}
-The system has one main use case as defined here. See Table \ref{table:simulation_parameters}.
+\section{User Interaction with the System}
+The system has one main way to be used as defined in \autoref{table:simulation_parameters}.
 
 \begin{table}
     \begin{center}
         \begin{tabularx}{\columnwidth}{l|X}
-            \multicolumn{2}{c}{Main Use Case} \\
+            \multicolumn{2}{c}{Main System Usage} \\
             \hline
             Preconditions   & \tabitem The configurator is opened with the same session on each of the group member's machines \\
                             & \tabitem The configuration is in an unfinished state (this state is a consensus state)\\
@@ -58,13 +58,15 @@ The system has one main use case as defined here. See Table \ref{table:simulatio
                             & \tabitem[3.] If not all users have given their preferences go to step 1. \\
             \hline
         \end{tabularx}
-        \caption{Main Use Case}
+        \caption{A description of the main way users will interact with the system}
         \label{table:simulation_parameters}
     \end{center}
 \end{table}
 
 \FloatBarrier
 
+\FloatBarrier
+
 \section{Technical Focus}
 
 Given an unfinished configuration and preferences of all group members rate a finished configuration on how well "similar" it reflects the configuration + preferences.