diff --git a/30_Thesis/figures/60_evaluation/tc_change__multi__db-size-148.pdf b/30_Thesis/figures/60_evaluation/tc_change__multi__db-size-148.pdf
index 66c7ed4..4faf196 100644
--- a/30_Thesis/figures/60_evaluation/tc_change__multi__db-size-148.pdf
+++ b/30_Thesis/figures/60_evaluation/tc_change__multi__db-size-148.pdf
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:c79bdd096a03e1fc8e079e4bb93a04880406212bbf6ca513794b2a6aa00bc5bb
-size 13637
+oid sha256:c03fdba74e0e3dd7ed975c329ae803bddc4f604e0b1821ba9cac689279d4d5e1
+size 13752
diff --git a/30_Thesis/figures/60_evaluation/tc_dictator__multi__db-size-148.pdf b/30_Thesis/figures/60_evaluation/tc_dictator__multi__db-size-148.pdf
index 2e2b7f1..0a61df3 100644
--- a/30_Thesis/figures/60_evaluation/tc_dictator__multi__db-size-148.pdf
+++ b/30_Thesis/figures/60_evaluation/tc_dictator__multi__db-size-148.pdf
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:d23d1b4c3317aaf3cb186e59c7c1c8428281bb9f5527fe101d70422692dac048
-size 13900
+oid sha256:da45288c1aa3bcec6c72eecefe22aa5ce85c2150f470a2d42a69b50207f811a9
+size 14032
diff --git a/30_Thesis/sections/60_evaluation.tex b/30_Thesis/sections/60_evaluation.tex
index 4fb78a8..a774bd1 100644
--- a/30_Thesis/sections/60_evaluation.tex
+++ b/30_Thesis/sections/60_evaluation.tex
@@ -206,8 +206,9 @@ Understanding data is made easier by first posing hypothesises. This section giv
 
 \subsection{Choosing tc}
 
-To get an understanding of the data all parameters except the $tc$ will be fixed. The preference aggregation strategy looked at is multiplication. The configuration database is used with all possible solutions (which is 148 in total). This results in a bigger visible effect as the recommender has access to all possible configurations. \autoref{fig:Evaluation:tcChange} shows the satisfaction change based on choice of $tc$. Of note is that the maxima of satisfaction change precedes the minima of dissatisfaction change for all group types. Maxima and minima occur at different tc values depending on the group type. Heterogeneous groups peek earliest while homogenous groups only show a peek towards the maximum $tc$ value. Changes in dissatisfaction are minimal even with $tc$ close to its maximum value. \autoref{fig:Evaluation:tcCount} shows the amount of group members satisfied and dissatisfied with a decision. The number of satisfied people decreases with an increasing $tc$ and its downward movement accelerates. The dissatisfaction curve shows a similar trend but in contrast here the number of dissatisfied group members increases with and increase in $tc$. The curve accelerates its growth analogues to the acceleration of the satisfaction curve. The behaviour of homogenous groups and random groups is similar but the curve for heterogeneous groups show less happiness for a given tc and more unhappiness. Homogeneous groups only have happy group members for most $tc$ values but they decrease rapidly for values greater $85$. Dissatisfied group members are at zero for the whole value range of $tc$ except a very slight upward tick at the end that is barely noticeable.   
+To get an understanding of the data all parameters except the $tc$ will be fixed. The preference aggregation strategy looked at is multiplication. The configuration database is used with all possible solutions (which is 148 in total). This results in a bigger visible effect as the recommender has access to all possible configurations. \autoref{fig:Evaluation:tcChange} shows the satisfaction change based on choice of $tc$. Of note is that the maxima of satisfaction change precedes the minima of dissatisfaction change for all group types. Maxima and minima occur at different tc values depending on the group type. Heterogeneous groups peek earliest while homogenous groups only show a peek towards the maximum $tc$ value. Changes in dissatisfaction are minimal even with $tc$ close to its maximum value. \autoref{fig:Evaluation:tcCount} shows the amount of group members satisfied and dissatisfied with a decision. The number of satisfied people decreases with an increasing $tc$ and its downward movement accelerates. The dissatisfaction curve shows a similar trend but in contrast here the number of dissatisfied group members increases with and increase in $tc$. The curve accelerates its growth analogues to the acceleration of the satisfaction curve. The behaviour of heterogeneous groups and random groups is similar but the curve for heterogeneous groups show less happiness for a given tc and more unhappiness. Also both curves have a negative satisfaction change when $tc$ reaches a certain height. Homogeneous groups only have happy group members for most $tc$ values but they decrease rapidly for values greater $85$. Dissatisfied group members are at zero for the whole value range of $tc$ except a very slight upward tick at the end that is barely noticeable.
 
+\todo[inline]{take reference to hypothesises that are regarding tc}
 \begin{figure}
     \centering
     \includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{./figures/60_evaluation/tc_change__multi__db-size-148.pdf}
diff --git a/Additional_Notes/analysis_tc.ods b/Additional_Notes/analysis_tc.ods
index 68d9833..18e8172 100644
--- a/Additional_Notes/analysis_tc.ods
+++ b/Additional_Notes/analysis_tc.ods
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:4ddb45d16ac539fb2c4dd3713506d349b4e6e623156c6b743ac31ca428022d98
-size 41366
+oid sha256:5441ea8fce65846702eca3bbe40bbea24ddd95b0f78ac23d8a90fc7824448458
+size 38103