added some todos and missing figures

30_Thesis/sections/00_introduction.tex

@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
 \chapter{Introduction}
 \label{ch:Introduction}
 
+\todo[inline]{1st Relevance of the topic - why is configuration relevant, why is group configuration relevant - group configuration new field - why recommendations for it}
+\todo[inline]{2nd Getting to the research question - issues with group decisions - forschungsfrage }
+\todo[inline]{3rd what does this thesis create - To answer this question xyz will be created and evaluated}
+
+
 \section{Problem}
 \label{sec:Introduction:Problem}
 
@@ -36,6 +41,8 @@ The benefits of this approach are, that the need for a group to communicate dire
 \section{Action}
 \label{sec:Introduction:Action}
 
+\todo[inline]{move to evaluation}
+
 As resulting action in this thesis a prototype will be designed, implemented and evaluated that achieves the following objectives.
 \begin{itemize}
     \item A system should give recommendation for the group using a scoring function that takes into account preferences of group members and the current state of the situation.

30_Thesis/sections/50_design_and_implementation.tex

@@ -53,3 +53,6 @@ Extending \citeauthor{raabKollaborativeProduktkonfigurationEchtzeit2019} \cite{r
     \caption{Architecture of Collaborative Configurator Merlin with an added recommender system.}
     \label{fig:DesignImplementation:RecommenderForCollaborativeConfiguratorMerlin}
 \end{figure}
+
+
+\missingfigure{Figure showing screenshot of configurator UI}

30_Thesis/sections/60_evaluation.tex

@@ -87,3 +87,10 @@ These user profiles can be used to generate rather homogenous groups but also to
     \caption{The process used for generating data for the evaluation.}
     \label{fig:Evaluation:GeneratingDataProcess}
 \end{figure}
+
+\section{Results}
+\label{fig:Evaluation:Results}
+
+\todo[inline]{explaining evaluations}
+
+\missingfigure{Result figure}