add reference for cross validation

This commit is contained in:
hannes.kuchelmeister
2020-05-09 14:29:39 +02:00
parent f93a94d3a3
commit c41ee2b7f1
2 changed files with 11 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -1005,6 +1005,16 @@ procedure.},
langid = {english}
}
@inproceedings{kohaviStudyCrossValidationBootstrap1995,
title = {A {{Study}} of {{Cross}}-{{Validation}} and {{Bootstrap}} for {{Accuracy Estimation}} and {{Model Selection}}},
author = {Kohavi, Ron},
date = {1995},
pages = {1137--1143},
publisher = {{Morgan Kaufmann}},
abstract = {We review accuracy estimation methods and compare the two most common methods: crossvalidation and bootstrap. Recent experimental results on artificial data and theoretical results in restricted settings have shown that for selecting a good classifier from a set of classifiers (model selection), ten-fold cross-validation may be better than the more expensive leaveone -out cross-validation. We report on a largescale experiment---over half a million runs of C4.5 and a Naive-Bayes algorithm---to estimate the effects of different parameters on these algorithms on real-world datasets. For crossvalidation, we vary the number of folds and whether the folds are stratified or not; for bootstrap, we vary the number of bootstrap samples. Our results indicate that for real-word datasets similar to ours, the best method to use for model selection is ten-fold stratified cross validation, even if computation power allows using more folds. 1 Introduction It can not be emphasized enough that no claim ...},
file = {C\:\\Users\\Hannes.Kuchelmeister\\Zotero\\storage\\GGH5NYBZ\\Kohavi_1995_A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model.pdf;C\:\\Users\\Hannes.Kuchelmeister\\Zotero\\storage\\M7BT7CCG\\summary.html}
}
@online{kuchelmeister13hannes11BachelorThesis,
title = {13hannes11/Bachelor\_thesis\_m.Recommend},
author = {Kuchelmeister, Hannes F.},