From acbacac9cd51ec60e27715c83aa5b39d07097347 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "hannes.kuchelmeister" <hannes.kuchelmeister@cas.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 11:34:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] combine section future work and conclusion

---
 30_Thesis/sections/70_future_work.tex | 11 -----------
 30_Thesis/sections/80_conclusion.tex  | 14 ++++++++++++++
 30_Thesis/thesis.tex                  |  1 -
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 30_Thesis/sections/70_future_work.tex

diff --git a/30_Thesis/sections/70_future_work.tex b/30_Thesis/sections/70_future_work.tex
deleted file mode 100644
index 1fd5618..0000000
--- a/30_Thesis/sections/70_future_work.tex
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-\chapter{Further Work}
-\label{ch:FurtherWork}
-
-\section{Possible Extensions or Further Research}
-\label{sec:FurtherWork:PossibleExtensions}
-
-\begin{itemize}
-    \item How to optimise such that no need to search through all stored finished configurations is necessary? (e.g. improve runtime from $\mathcal{O}(n)$ to $\mathcal{O}(log\ n)$)
-    \item How to model hierarchy and knowledge about product components in preferences?
-    \item Letting users set preferences for product functions (e.g. for a forest a recreation function, a productive function, a protective function, etc.). How does it compare to explicitly choosing preferences?
-\end{itemize}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/30_Thesis/sections/80_conclusion.tex b/30_Thesis/sections/80_conclusion.tex
index 639ff8c..a3e7d2e 100644
--- a/30_Thesis/sections/80_conclusion.tex
+++ b/30_Thesis/sections/80_conclusion.tex
@@ -1,2 +1,16 @@
 \chapter{Conclusion}
 \label{ch:Conclusion}
+
+\section{Further Research}
+\label{sec:Conclusion:PossibleExtensions}
+
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item How to optimise such that no need to search through all stored finished configurations is necessary? (e.g. improve runtime from $\mathcal{O}(n)$ to $\mathcal{O}(log\ n)$)
+    \item How to model hierarchy and knowledge about product components in preferences?
+    \item Letting users set preferences for product functions (e.g. for a forest a recreation function, a productive function, a protective function, etc.). How does it compare to explicitly choosing preferences?
+    \item Does the assumption that the closer the configuration state is to a finished configuration, the less the satisfaction increase and the less difference among recommended configurations hold true?
+    \item Validating if satisfaction correlates with theoretical metric used in this thesis
+\end{itemize}
+
+\section{Summary}
+\label{sec:Conclusion:Summary}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/30_Thesis/thesis.tex b/30_Thesis/thesis.tex
index 07defd4..d7bc03e 100644
--- a/30_Thesis/thesis.tex
+++ b/30_Thesis/thesis.tex
@@ -190,7 +190,6 @@
 \input{sections/50_design_and_implementation.tex}
 \input{sections/60_evaluation.tex}
 \input{sections/65_related_work.tex}
-\input{sections/70_future_work.tex}
 \input{sections/80_conclusion.tex}