diff --git a/30_Thesis/sections/80_conclusion.tex b/30_Thesis/sections/80_conclusion.tex
index 6cbe7d1..61828b9 100644
--- a/30_Thesis/sections/80_conclusion.tex
+++ b/30_Thesis/sections/80_conclusion.tex
@@ -13,17 +13,8 @@ Overall it is possible to suggest compromises in group-based configuration which
 
 \section{Limitations}
 \label{sec:Conclusion:Limitations}
-\begin{itemize}
-    \item Recognising the Limitations
-        \begin{itemize}
-            \item Only looked at one use case
-            \item Only offline evaluation
-            \item Groups automatically generated - No real groups
-            \item Group size fixed to four people
-            \item Performance for bigger products not validated
-        \end{itemize}
-    \item Making recommendations for further research work 
-\end{itemize}
+
+Due to the scope of this thesis it was not possible to analyse all possible scenarios for the proposed approach. The findings need to be validated with real users as only an offline metric has been used. Moreover, only one use case was considered. Therefore, different use cases could yield different results. Furthermore, groups were automatically generated and thus, possibly lack resemblance to common real world group constellations. Additionally, the group size was fixed to four members and deviating results for differently sized groups are possible. Finally, larger product that contain many more features and many more characteristics potentially can limit this approach.
 
 \section{Further Research}
 \label{sec:Conclusion:PossibleExtensions}