13hannes11/bachelor_thesis
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/13hannes11/bachelor_thesis.git synced 2024-09-04 01:11:00 +02:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

add section for group dynamics and bias

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
hannes.kuchelmeister
2019-12-13 15:07:35 +01:00
parent 71c30f567e
commit 89e4bcfaf7
1 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
02_Proposal/sections/20_related_work.tex
View File

@@ -38,4 +38,10 @@
\section{Group Dynamics and Bias} \section{Group Dynamics and Bias}
\label{sec:Related_Work:GroupDynamicsAndBias} \label{sec:Related_Work:GroupDynamicsAndBias}
\todo[inline]{write about group dynamics and bias} \begin{description}[style=unboxed, leftmargin=0cm, font=\normalfont]
\item[\citeauthor{charnessGroupsMakeBetter2012}] study group decision-making in the context of classical game-theoretic games. They find that groups act more rational in these contexts but also note that this can lead to decisions that sacrifice social welfare towards individual gain. They also note that diversity increases effectiveness of the group if the environment is of participatory nature in an environment that allows expression of diverse ideas \cite{charnessGroupsMakeBetter2012}.
\item[\citeauthor{bonnerEffectsMemberExpertise2002}] study the effects of expertise on group decision-making and performance. The look at an easy and a moderately difficult version of the game Mastermind. The results show that provided performance ratings for each group members helped groups use that expertise as group members gave more weight to high performing member's opinions. This effect was only visible when looking at the moderately difficult task. Using experts in groups caused them to perform significantly better than individuals. In their conclusion \citeauthor{bonnerEffectsMemberExpertise2002} note that expertise should be taken into account when modelling group decision-making \cite{bonnerEffectsMemberExpertise2002}.
\item[\citeauthor{atasItemRecommendationUsing2017}] look at how the diversity of recommendations in a group decision scenario effects information exchange among group members. In the conducted study participants chose exam topics in a group. They had support by a system that aids group decisions. A noticeable result was that increased recommendation diversity lead to greater information exchange in groups \cite{atasItemRecommendationUsing2017}.
\item[\citeauthor{felfernigBiasesGroupDecisions2018}] give an overview over biases that occur in groups. Additionally they provide some measures to reduce these biases. The presented biases range from biases that are also prevalent in individuals to biases that only effect groups \cite{felfernigBiasesGroupDecisions2018}.
\end{description}