mirror of
https://github.com/13hannes11/bachelor_thesis.git
synced 2024-09-04 01:11:00 +02:00
add short caption to tables and figures
This commit is contained in:
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ To evaluate the recommender, a use case is needed. In this thesis, a forestry us
|
||||
& high & & & & & & & & & n & & n & n & & & n & & & & - & - & - \\ \hline
|
||||
|
||||
\end{tabularx}
|
||||
\caption{Constrains in \emph{not with} form for the foreststry use case.}
|
||||
\caption[Forestry Use Case: Constraints]{Constrains in \emph{not with} form for the forestry use case.}
|
||||
\label{tab:Evaluation:UseCase}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{table}
|
||||
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ This section describes the data generation process as seen in \autoref{fig:Evalu
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{./figures/60_evaluation/bpmn_evaluation_input_data_generation.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{Data generation process for the evaluation}
|
||||
\caption[Data Generation Process]{Data generation process for the evaluation}
|
||||
\label{fig:Evaluation:GeneratingDataProcess}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ For the forestry use case, the idea is that there are multiple types of user pro
|
||||
\addplot [draw=black, style={dotted}][very thick] {gauss(0.75,0.1)} node[text=black][above,pos=0.5] {positive};
|
||||
\end{axis}
|
||||
\end{tikzpicture}
|
||||
\caption{Distribution of preferences for a user type.}
|
||||
\caption[Preference Distribution]{Distribution of preferences for a user type.}
|
||||
\label{fig:Evaluation:PreferenceDistribution}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ For the forestry use case, the idea is that there are multiple types of user pro
|
||||
$(\textit{accessibility}, \text{high})$ & \textit{positive} & \textbf{negative} & \textbf{negative} & neutral \\
|
||||
\hline
|
||||
\end{tabular}
|
||||
\caption{ The attitudes of each group member profile. }
|
||||
\caption[Forestry Use Case: Group Member Profiles]{The attitudes of each group member profile.}
|
||||
\label{tab:Evaluation:GroupMemberMappings}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{table}
|
||||
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ This section aims at finding a $tc$ parameter for the analysis. This is required
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{./figures/60_evaluation/tc_change__multi__db-size-148.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{The average satisfaction and dissatisfaction change based on $tc$ with a database size of 148 and multiplication as aggregation strategy.}
|
||||
\caption[Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction: Change based on $tc$]{The average satisfaction and dissatisfaction change based on $tc$ with a database size of 148 and multiplication as aggregation strategy.}
|
||||
\label{fig:Evaluation:tcChange}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ This section aims at finding a $tc$ parameter for the analysis. This is required
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{./figures/60_evaluation/tc_dictator__multi__db-size-148.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{The average satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the dictator's decision based on $tc$.}
|
||||
\caption[Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction: Average based on $tc$]{The average satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the dictator's decision based on $tc$.}
|
||||
\label{fig:Evaluation:tcCount}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -267,21 +267,21 @@ During a group decision it is better to make one less person dissatisfied than t
|
||||
\begin{figure}[p]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{./figures/60_evaluation/heterogeneous_combined__amount-1000__tc-70}
|
||||
\caption{The satisfaction and dissatisfaction using the group recommender for heterogeneous groups with $tc = 70$.}
|
||||
\caption[Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction: Heterogeneous Groups]{The satisfaction and dissatisfaction using the group recommender for heterogeneous groups with $tc = 70$.}
|
||||
\label{fig:Evaluation:HeteroSatisfaction}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[p]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{./figures/60_evaluation/random_combined__amount-1000__tc-85}
|
||||
\caption{The satisfaction and dissatisfaction using the group recommender for random groups with $tc = 85$.}
|
||||
\caption[Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction: Random Groups]{The satisfaction and dissatisfaction using the group recommender for random groups with $tc = 85$.}
|
||||
\label{fig:Evaluation:RandomSatisfaction}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[p]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{./figures/60_evaluation/homogeneous_combined__amount-1000__tc-94}
|
||||
\caption{The satisfaction and dissatisfaction using the group recommender for homogeneous groups with $tc = 94$.}
|
||||
\caption[Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction: Homogeneous Groups]{The satisfaction and dissatisfaction using the group recommender for homogeneous groups with $tc = 94$.}
|
||||
\label{fig:Evaluation:HomoSatisfaction}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user