use sdq template now for outline

This commit is contained in:
hannes.kuchelmeister
2020-02-18 14:53:13 +01:00
parent 78b4e53b63
commit 09073917ec
21 changed files with 10941 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
\chapter{Introduction}
\section{Research Gap}
There does not exists much research on recommendation for group configuration, however it is comprised of two different areas of research, recommenders for groups and recommenders for configuration.
The existing literature on recommenders for groups is extensive with many different approaches and domains \cite{delicResearchMethodsGroup2016, chenInterfaceInteractionDesign2011, atasItemRecommendationUsing2017, jamesonRecommendationGroups2007, chenEmpatheticonsDesigningEmotion2014, liuCGSPAComprehensiveGroup2019}. \citeauthor{felfernigGroupRecommenderSystems2018} give an overview about basic approaches \cite{felfernigGroupRecommenderSystems2018}.
In are of product configuration research about recommender systems is undertaken as well \cite{pereiraFeaturebasedPersonalizedRecommender2016, scholzConfigurationbasedRecommenderSystem2017, scholzEffectsDecisionSpace2017}.
In are of product configuration research about recommender systems is undertaken as well \cite{pereiraFeatureBasedPersonalizedRecommender2016, scholzConfigurationbasedRecommenderSystem2017, scholzEffectsDecisionSpace2017}.
Group configuration is a more specialized sub field of configuration therefore less research exists on that and because of that there has not been much research on recommenders that are for group recommendation.
%Commonly for content-based recommenders categories based on content are created and a separate user or group profile is generated based on the preferences of whole items. For configuration recommenders however this would create additional modelling or content grouping workload, therefore in this thesis it is proposed to use attributes of a configuration as distinguishing categories.

View File

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
\chapter{Foundations}
\section{Definitions}
Set of \emph{variables}:

View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
\chapter{Related Work}

View File

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
\chapter{Concept}
\section{User Interaction with the System}
The system has one main way to be used as defined in \autoref{tab:MainUseCase}.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
\chapter{Design and Implementation}

View File

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
\chapter{Evaluation}
\section{Evaluation of Case Study}
For one example e.g. forest example generate all possible valid configurations.

View File

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
\chapter{Further Work}
\section{Possible Extensions or Further Research}
\begin{itemize}